New Tree Header

[Back]
Next
POPSG
home
MRlibrary
Sorensen
Associates
[Views home]
Views
Researcher
Resumes
In-store
Bibliography
Register for
Email Views
[Next]
Previous

Did they read what you really meant to say?

November 14, 2004 - by Robert E. Stevens, GENESIS II (The Second Beginning) E-Mail: views@aol.com

Market research is really all about effective communication. Some will say it is about conducting research or learning and understanding. Yes, it is, but it all starts and ends with clear communication, communication from the client to the researcher, the researcher to the participant, the participant back to the researcher and finally the researcher to the client. Communication includes spoken and/or printed words, actions, voice reflections, punctuation, body language, etc.

During a recent presentation of a shortened version of "Researching Research," where I discussed the five major weak areas of consumer research and the four primary root causes of the weaknesses, I had written the following question on the board.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

            Woman without her man is useless.
                [   ] agree
                [   ] disagree

I did not address the question until well into the presentation. I wanted the participants to reflect on the question.  When I did address the question, I asked, who agreed and who disagreed. Not surprisingly, the responses were split across gender lines. Most of the women present disagreed with the statement. I mentioned that I thought their disagreement was unusual since the last time I asked members of the audience the same question, the females present voted over-whelmingly in agreement. Needless to say this came as a surprise to those present until I told them I had not completed the statement. I then went back to the board and made the following additions.

            Woman, without her, man is useless.

Now the women were in agreement with the statement. But one of the young men in the back of the room stated that I had made a mistake. He suggested that I had the second comma in the wrong place. He said the statement should read as follows. 

            Woman, without her man, is useless. 

Imagine, one comma resulted in a 180 degree change in meaning. But without the comma, who knows how to read the sentence? When designing your research how careful are you of dual meanings?


Sponsor: Sorensen Associates Inc     Portland, OR: 800.542.0123     Minneapolis, MN: 888.616.0123
the in-store research company™  --  Dedicated to the relentless pursuit of WHY?

[Back]
Next
POPSG
home
MRlibrary
Sorensen
Associates
[Views home]
Views
Researcher
Resumes
In-store
Bibliography
Register for
Email Views
[Next]
Previous